This wiki was setup to spread ideas that will bring about policy changes needed to solve the access to justice problem. We do so by debunking false arguments that have been used for the continued restrictions of the practice of law. We are also promoting new arguments that haven't been offered before to lift those restrictions.

Arguments to Debunk

Non-lawyers who practices law will harms consumers.
A two-tier legal system is bad for consumers.
Non-lawyer owners will cause lawyer-employees to violate their ethical code of conduct.
The access to justice problem is where indigents do not have attorney representation in court.

Arguments to Promote

What access to justice really means?
Legal technology companies such as LegalZoom provide people with access to justice.
Non-lawyers can be legally required to comply with the ethical code of conduct.

Main Page

Arguments to Debunk

Arguments to Promote

Navigation menu