Main Page: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
If you want to help solve the access to justice problem, then you can do so by: | If you want to help solve the access to justice problem, then you can do so by: | ||
# Sharing these ideas with others. | # Sharing these ideas with others. | ||
# Adding content to this website. Send an e-mail to [email protected] if you need help doing so. | # Adding content to this website. Send an e-mail to [mailto:[email protected] the admin] if you need help doing so. | ||
<h1>Arguments to Debunk</h1> | <h1>Arguments to Debunk</h1> | ||
Revision as of 00:42, 18 August 2023
This wiki was setup to spread ideas that will bring about policy changes needed to solve the access to justice problem. We do so by debunking false arguments that have been used for the continued restrictions of the practice of law. We are also promoting new arguments that haven't been offered before to lift those restrictions.
If you want to help solve the access to justice problem, then you can do so by:
- Sharing these ideas with others.
- Adding content to this website. Send an e-mail to the admin if you need help doing so.
Arguments to Debunk
- A non-lawyers who practices law will harm consumers.
- Allowing non-lawyers to practice law will create a two-tier justice system.
- The access to justice problem is where indigents do not have attorney representation in court.