Main Page: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
<h1>Arguments to Debunk</h1> | <h1>Arguments to Debunk</h1> | ||
* [[A non-lawyers who practices law will harm consumers.]] | * [[A non-lawyers who practices law will harm consumers.]] | ||
* [[ | * [[Allowing non-lawyers to practice law will create a two-tier justice system.]] | ||
* [[Non-lawyer owners will cause lawyer-employees to violate their ethical code of conduct.]] | * [[Non-lawyer owners will cause lawyer-employees to violate their ethical code of conduct.]] | ||
* [[The access to justice problem is where indigents do not have attorney representation in court.]] | * [[The access to justice problem is where indigents do not have attorney representation in court.]] | ||
Revision as of 01:29, 17 August 2023
This wiki was setup to spread ideas that will bring about policy changes needed to solve the access to justice problem. We do so by debunking false arguments that have been used for the continued restrictions of the practice of law. We are also promoting new arguments that haven't been offered before to lift those restrictions.
If you want to help solve the access to justice problem, then you can do so by:
- Sharing these ideas with others.
- Adding content to this website. Send an e-mail to [email protected] if you need help doing so.
Arguments to Debunk
- A non-lawyers who practices law will harm consumers.
- Allowing non-lawyers to practice law will create a two-tier justice system.
- Non-lawyer owners will cause lawyer-employees to violate their ethical code of conduct.
- The access to justice problem is where indigents do not have attorney representation in court.