Editing
Legal technology companies provide people with access to justice
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Arguments== # Litigants who use legal technology companies (e.g., Legal Zoom) legal agreement drafting services will usually get better results than those who create agreements on their own when their case goes to court. # If a legal technology company is helping users get better results when their case goes to court, then that company is helping to solve the [[access to justice]] problem. # Legal technology companies offering legal agreement drafting services is helping to solve the access to justice problem.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Moral and Practical may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
MoralAndPractical:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Page
Discussion
English
Views
Read
Edit
View history
More
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information